Lena Dunham: Not Worthy of Positive Attention

top

Two Colorado professors, Gillian Silverman and Elissa Auther, run a series of events held at Denver’s Museum of Contemporary Art called “Feminism & Co.” It’s a really fascinating series with events like “Women in Prison”, a panel that discussed why women enter prison and the cycle that keeps them there. It’s really a very cool event series that I’m excited to attend.

I’m really worried, however, about the event coming up this week.  The event is titled “The New Anti-Heroine”. This event, hosted by Sarah Hagelin (TV critic and professor of cultural studies at CU Denver) will be discussing the rise of the anti-heroine on TV shows such as Homeland, Enlightened, and the Misadventures of Awkward Black Girl—but will focus on Lena Dunham’s HBO series Girls.

The reason I’m worried isn’t about the Anti-Heroine concept and its rise. I’m worried because I really don’t like Girls getting publicity.

HBO_Girls_Premiere

Look, I’m sure it’s a great show with really cool concepts and a major change to the status quo. However, it is exceptionally white-washed—and Dunham doesn’t seem to care. All of the main characters are white. The only POC on the show are given roles that are servant or non-essential roles (Jamaican Nanny, Roosevelt Hotel Bellhop, Tibetan Nanny, Young Black Guy, etc). Dunham herself also seems to have no ability to recognize her racist and homophobic comments in life.

hbo-girls-lena-dunham

I honestly don’t see how Dunham can be praised for her work when so much is wrong with it. Sure, you can like some aspects of a work that is deeply problematic, but so few people seem to realize just how bad it really is. Should we really be giving positive attention to her and her work? Isn’t it about time that we stop giving praise to those that are so lacking in so many other ways? I think so. Now let’s work for a change in Hollywood. We all deserve a little bit of representation—not just the social majority.

Advertisements